Solutions / Succession planning
Your loudest performer is not always your future leader.
Objective criteria and accelerated development tracks to find and grow real high-potential talent.
Not every strong performer is a future leader, and not every future leader is your loudest performer. We build objective criteria to identify true high-potential talent and design accelerated development tracks to prepare them for what is next. Find your future leaders before your competitors do.
Signals you have this problem
- High-potential status is decided by whoever advocates loudest.
- The list is the same people every year.
- Strong performers are labelled high potential without distinction.
- Quiet contributors are consistently overlooked.
What the engagement looks like
-
Separate performance from potential
They are different measurements and conflating them is the single most common error in this work.
-
Define criteria
Learning agility, capacity for complexity, and aspiration, assessed rather than assumed.
-
Calibrate across leaders
A structured session where nominations are tested, so the list reflects the organization rather than the advocacy.
-
Build accelerated tracks
Stretch assignments, exposure, and coaching, rather than an additional training course.
Common questions
Should the list be public?
Rarely fully public, but individuals should generally know. Secret lists leak, and the leak is worse than the disclosure.
How do you avoid the same names every year?
Calibration and objective criteria. Without them, the list measures visibility rather than potential and reproduces itself.
What if someone is on the list and should not be?
Remove them, with a real conversation. Leaving someone on the list to avoid the conversation devalues it for everyone.
Related work
This engagement frequently runs alongside our assessment work.
Identify your high potentials.
A short conversation is usually enough to tell whether coaching, training, or assessment is the right starting point.